Football Tactics Board: The 3-5-2 formation explained

      

Football Tactics Board: The 3-5-2 formation explained

 

The 3-5-2 formation was born in the 1980s as an attacking variation to the 5-3-2, and soon emerged as an effective solution against the two-striker problem. In this article, we analyze the pros and cons of the formation and look at several instances where it has been practiced by football managers.

Background

Argentina under Carlos Bilardo implemented the 3-5-2 formation for the first time in international matches. That was way back in 1986 in a team that had Maradona and Valdano as the two strikers. Former Brazil manager, Sebastiao Lazaroni used this during the 1990 World Cup. Six years later, England under Terry Venables used this during their Euro campaign.

Much has changed since. With more and more teams opting for a single striker model, the 3-5-2 has fallen in popularity. Apart from a few teams in the Italian Serie A, the system has become mostly outdated.

What's the idea behind it?

With two strikers and a five-man midfield, it is evident that the focus remains solely on maintaining possession and scoring goals. The wing backs have a flexible job - they do not enjoy much defensive responsibility per se, but are expected to drop down and help the three-man defense, should the need arise. Thus, the formation can very well change to 5-3-2 while defending from the original 3-5-2.

This is tremendously effective against a 4-4-2 where the defence has an extra man to clear the danger, and the midfield heavily outnumbers that of the opposition, leaving no space for an attack to build up.

Player roles

The system deploys two strikers with ample support from the wide midfielders. The 3-5-2 being an attack-friendly formation, ensures there won't be any deficit of chances, but the strikers need to have adequate finishing skills to convert them into results. At least one of the strikers must be good at heading, for there should be enough crosses from the wings during attacks.

The midfield is heavily loaded with three central midfielders and two wide ones. Some mangers prefer two of the three central midfielders to be defensive-minded and the middle one to act as a central attacking midfielder. The wide players are expected to have a lot of pace, dribbling abilities and enough stamina to last 90 minutes. The last attribute is especially important since they have to shoulder the dual responsibilities of wingers as well as full-backs.

The three center backs must possess the qualities of both traditional center backs as well as full-backs since the left and right center backs are often needed to race out to the flanks to clear attacks, especially against overlapping fullbacks. Understandably, such specialized defenders are tough to find these days.

How to beat the system?

The 3-5-2 can be as much a headache as it can be a boon. While it focuses on outnumbering the opposition in the midfield and leading attacks while enjoying possession, it can quickly push a team into the back foot when the ball is at the opposition's feet. It leaves the wider areas in defence open with no back-up whatsoever for the wide midfielders.

3-5-2 weakness

Most teams in modern football employ a single forward. This leaves the team playing 3-5-2 with three defenders against one center forward. Essentially, this means two of them are wasted in their positions, while the opposition can gain from having an extra man in the midfield.

Moreover, the system becomes especially difficult when the opposition team uses a false No. 9. If one of the defenders tracks him up the field, he will be dragged out of position, but if he doesn't, the back three is left with no men to mark, thus becoming vulnerable to sudden attacks.

3-5-2 weakness

Cesc Fabregas coming in from deep to score against Italy in Euro 2012 is a fine example in this case.

Successful examples of 3-5-2 application

The 3-5-2 is clearly a difficult system to implement successfully if one doesn't have the resources, as Manchester United fans began to realize during the first couple of matches in the 2014-15 season. Louis van Gaal had exercised the formation almost as a last resort at the World Cup during his tenure as the Netherlands coach, and it worked for him because he had the players. At Manchester United, he earned a loss and a tame 1-1 draw against Sunderland in the early part of the season.

Among managers with a penchant for high possession stats and relentless pressing, only a few like Pep Guardiola and Marcelo Biesla have reaped immense dividends from the 3-5-2. Antonio Conte used it effectively at Juventus, while others like Paul Lambert at Aston Villa suffered the repercussions of a badly managed system.

Variations of the 3-5-2

A variation of the 3-5-2 is the 5-3-2 where the wide players fall back and man the field as full-backs. Some managers prefer the 'W' formation which finds the central midfielder slightly up the pitch in a more attacking position and his mates on either side acting as defensive midfielders.

 

 

Load More

Manchester United Bayern joins race to sign Liverpool and Man United transfer target

Manchester City Guardiola identifies Real Madrid target as potential Sterling and Sane partner

Manchester United Jose Mourinho wants Neuer to replace De Gea

Chelsea Chelsea close to signing 23-year-old Roma defender

Arsenal Aubameyang has rejected offers from two La Liga clubs in favour of Arsenal

Talking Points Arsenal 2-1 Chelsea: What the Statistics Say

Manchester United Luke Shaw praises Sanchez after two days of training together

Chelsea Will Chelsea offer Eden Hazard for Ousmane Dembele?

Chelsea Chelsea transfer boost: Vidal uncertain over his future

Liverpool Liverpool close to signing 18-year-old left-back from Falkirk

Arsenal Could Arsenal make a u-turn on Aubameyang and sign Mahrez instead?

Talking Points Arsenal vs. Chelsea: Three things to expect from the Carabao Cup semi-final

Premier League 2017/18

# Team P GD Pts
1 Manchester City FC 38 79 100
2 Manchester United FC 38 40 81
3 Tottenham Hotspur FC 38 38 77
4 Liverpool FC 38 46 75
5 Chelsea FC 38 24 70
6 Arsenal FC 38 23 63
7 Burnley FC 38 -3 54
8 Everton FC 38 -14 49
9 Leicester City FC 38 -4 47
10 Newcastle United FC 38 -8 44
11 Crystal Palace FC 38 -10 44
12 AFC Bournemouth 38 -16 44
13 West Ham United FC 38 -20 42
14 Watford FC 38 -20 41
15 Brighton & Hove Albion 38 -20 40
16 Huddersfield Town 38 -30 37
17 Southampton FC 38 -19 36
18 Swansea City FC 38 -28 33
19 Stoke City FC 38 -33 33
20 West Bromwich Albion FC 38 -25 31