Mohamed Salah: Four reasons he flopped at Chelsea


Mohamed Salah: Four reasons he flopped at Chelsea

Picture: Илья Хохлов

Quick, direct, dynamic, and creative: with these words Mourinho summed up Mohamed Salah when he signed him in 2014.

Unfortunately, Salah never lived up to the hype in the two years he spent at Chelsea. It’s a shame because Salah has been showing his mojo at Roma and has been one of Serie A’s most prolific players. So far this season Salah has grabbed his first career hat-trick and has nine goals in twelve matches for Roma. And that’s not all: Salah’s 14 goals last season topped Roma’s goal-scoring charts.

He came on Mourinho’s radar when he bagged three goals against Chelsea with Basel. The British newspapers were quick to laud him one of the most promising prospects of the year. But his two goals in 19 appearances hint of a few rotten tomatoes during his two-year stint in London.

So what went wrong for the pacey winger?

Here are three reasons he flopped at Stamford Bridge:

Tough Competition

When you have four established attacking midfielders in front of you of the rank of Eden Hazard, Oscar, Willian and Andre Schurrle, it’s hardly any surprise Salah failed. Emerging players such as Bertrand Traore and Victor Moses made Mourinho’s decision even easier.

The pressure to perform in the little game time he received hardly made things easier too.

Salah needed to show real class if he would replace one of them on the pitch. Unfortunately, he didn’t.

Money and Rivals

Salah was bought from Basel for £11 million. Chelsea received around £2 million in loan fees from Roma and Fiorentina and another £16 million for his permanent transfer to Italy. The simple math is a profit of £7 million for a fringe player–pretty good.

The funds were reinvested into Juan Cuadrado’s move to Stanford Bridge.

On top of that, Salah had been a long-term target of Liverpool’s before he joined Chelsea. So, in a way, Mourinho killed two birds with one stone: preventing a rival from improving their squad and making a profit.

Mohamed Salah

Picture: Ultraslansi

Salah's style of play

Salah's style of play didn't rhyme with the Premier League. He is a left-footed and fast right winger who likes to exploit space and cut inside with the ball at his feet. 

In the little time he received on the pitch in England, he struggled to find that space. His defensive side is also not very developed, and that causes asks plenty of questions for midfielders in Premier League top sides. 

He didn’t get a chance

He showed glimpses of his ability in the second half of 2014 when he played more regularly. He found the net on a couple occasions against Arsenal and Stoke City.

From 2015 onwards Salah hardly got a sniff of first-team action, and struggled to convince the manager he deserved it. 

Ask his fans and they would argue that he didn't get a fair chance at Chelsea. They would be partly right.

It is fair to say Salah’s departure from Chelsea was a blessing in disguise, however. With Roma, he has opened a very shiny chapter of his career, while Chelsea will hardly spill a tear at his absence.  It’s a win/win.



Load More

Manchester United Bayern joins race to sign Liverpool and Man United transfer target

Manchester City Guardiola identifies Real Madrid target as potential Sterling and Sane partner

Manchester United Jose Mourinho wants Neuer to replace De Gea

Chelsea Chelsea close to signing 23-year-old Roma defender

Arsenal Aubameyang has rejected offers from two La Liga clubs in favour of Arsenal

Talking Points Arsenal 2-1 Chelsea: What the Statistics Say

Manchester United Luke Shaw praises Sanchez after two days of training together

Chelsea Will Chelsea offer Eden Hazard for Ousmane Dembele?

Chelsea Chelsea transfer boost: Vidal uncertain over his future

Liverpool Liverpool close to signing 18-year-old left-back from Falkirk

Arsenal Could Arsenal make a u-turn on Aubameyang and sign Mahrez instead?

Talking Points Arsenal vs. Chelsea: Three things to expect from the Carabao Cup semi-final

Premier League 2017/18

# Team P GD Pts
1 Manchester City FC 38 79 100
2 Manchester United FC 38 40 81
3 Tottenham Hotspur FC 38 38 77
4 Liverpool FC 38 46 75
5 Chelsea FC 38 24 70
6 Arsenal FC 38 23 63
7 Burnley FC 38 -3 54
8 Everton FC 38 -14 49
9 Leicester City FC 38 -4 47
10 Newcastle United FC 38 -8 44
11 Crystal Palace FC 38 -10 44
12 AFC Bournemouth 38 -16 44
13 West Ham United FC 38 -20 42
14 Watford FC 38 -20 41
15 Brighton & Hove Albion 38 -20 40
16 Huddersfield Town 38 -30 37
17 Southampton FC 38 -19 36
18 Swansea City FC 38 -28 33
19 Stoke City FC 38 -33 33
20 West Bromwich Albion FC 38 -25 31